Content Preview

MPRE Multiple Choice Exam 2025 Questions and Answers 1. A toy manufacturer was sue d by the parent of a child injured by one of its products. As the manufacturers attorney was preparing to respond to a discovery request from the plaintiff, the attorney found a document that was very damaging to his clients case. Prior to complying with the discovery request and turning over the document, the attorney called his opposing counsel and offered to settle the case. The attorney stated that although he believed his client was very likely to wind a summary judgment motion, they would settle the case for a modest amount to save the costs of litigation. In fact, the attorney believed his client had no chance of winning a summary judgment motion and was also likely to lose at trial based on the document he had found. The opposing counsel declined the attorney;s offer. The attorney turned over the document and the case proceeded to trial, where judgment was awarded to the plaintif - --Answer --C. Yes because the attorney's statement did not constitute statements of fact. (Explanation. Pg 58 B 1) and 2) An attorney was convinced that his client was suffering from dementia. The attorney spoke to his client's family physician and the client's only daughter to ....COPYRIGHT ©️ 2025 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED...TRUSTED & VERIFIED 1